Lin Baohua: Directly attacking Xi Jinping’s sensitive areas can stimulate infighting in the CCP

0
2021年2月20日,党史学习教育动员大会在北京召开。习近平出席会议并发表重要讲话。新华社记者 黄敬文/摄 建党网

On February 20, 2021, the Party History Learning and Education Mobilization Conference was held in Beijing. Xi Jinping attended the meeting and delivered an important speech. Xinhua News Agency reporter Huang Jingwen / She Jian Party Network

On February 20, 2021, the Party History Learning and Education Mobilization Conference was held in Beijing. Xi Jinping attended the meeting and delivered an important speech. Xinhua News Agency reporter Huang Jingwen / She Jian Party Network

U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi is about to visit Taiwan, but was publicly questioned by President Biden for saying that the military considered it “not a good idea.” Naturally, the CCP cannot pretend to be deaf and mute and must respond. Therefore, from the official to the “civilian”, various remarks have appeared, and they all have one thing in common, that is, they threaten to take military action. The most eloquent among them is Hu Xijin, the former editor-in-chief of the Global Times and a current special commentator. He posted two articles in a row on the evening of July 25, threatening that Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan would create a “narrow meeting” between the United States and China, and the People’s Liberation Army It will be an opportunity for military control of Taiwan; once a maritime conflict breaks out between the United States and China, the American aircraft carrier formation will be eliminated. In order to strictly maintain military secrets, Hu Xijin, the big-mouthed, did not disclose what means will be used to eliminate the US aircraft carrier formation.

Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan is not new. She raised it in April this year. At that time, Biden did not express his position because the US military did not speak? So the CCP didn’t react much at that time. The trip was later suspended after Pelosi tested positive for Wuhan pneumonia. So now it’s just a rehearsal. Without Biden’s words, the CCP’s response may have been a general response, such as scolding, solemn representation, and so on. However, Biden’s words gave Xi Jinping an opportunity to see where the needle is. Beijing made a big fuss about the objection of the US military, believing that the US military is afraid of fighting the CCP, so it emphasized that it should respond with military actions, and hoped that the US military would publicly stop Pello. West Taiwan trip. In this way, the U.S. military will show the face of a paper tiger, thereby increasing Xi Jinping’s ambition and destroying the prestige of the Yankees. To this end, Hu Xijin did not hesitate to pretend to be a military expert and say what the Chinese military dared not say, to destroy the US aircraft carrier formation!

Why does the US military say that Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan is “not a good idea”? Experts and public opinion have many explanations. In particular, he believes that the CCP is holding the Beidaihe Conference, and Xi Jinping wants to make arrangements for the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. Therefore, this is a sensitive moment, so Xi Jinping must show toughness in relations with the United States in order to show that he is a patriot and the founder of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. So at least he has to have some military action to show that this is what the U.S. military is worried about, worried that the tension will go wrong. However, it is the CCP’s habitual technique to create tensions to achieve deterrence and gain benefits. Therefore, Xi called for “struggle, struggle, and struggle.” As expected, the old and beautiful Obama was intimidated and is currently using the same method to scare Biden and Biden. US military.

However, the so-called sensitive timing is also an opportunity for the United States. Because of his sensitivity, Xi Jinping was forced to react. Regardless of the Beidaihe Conference and the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the crisis facing Xi Jinping is not only the relationship between the United States and China, but also the economic downturn, the unfinished building incident and the debt crisis of banks, as well as the huge public grievances caused by the closure of the city. Confidence crisis, especially the loss of middle-class trust. Now, if Pelosi persists in Taiwan despite the CCP’s intimidation, and Xi Jinping cannot eliminate the U.S. aircraft carrier formation, he will inevitably lose his prestige and can encourage the opposition within the party to gather strength to force Xi Jinping to step down in the face of embattlement. Therefore, it is myopic and shortsighted to think that Xi Jinping should not be provoked at sensitive times, and it does not rule out that those who have been bought by Xi Jinping have long been bought by Xi Jinping to help Xi Jinping out of trouble.

Only by directly attacking Xi Jinping’s sensitive areas can they trigger a strong reaction from vices, which will set off a huge wave; the deeper the stimulation, the more frantic the reaction will be, and the weaker underbelly will be exposed, which will help break the stagnant water at the top of the CCP. Regardless of whether Xi Jinping can survive or not, struggles within the CCP in various fields will inevitably lead to internal frictions, so that the space for civil resistance can be opened up. If Xi Jinping survives, he will inevitably go further to extremes, and only then can he speed up the time when extremes turn into opposites. The United States relies on dialogue and patrols with aircraft and ships.

Due to the arrogance of the CCP and Hu Xijin, General Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who has good relations with the CCP, had to make a tough speech, saying that he would do everything possible to protect Pelosi’s safety during his trip. Therefore, if Pelosi is not intimidated by the CCP and insists on visiting Taiwan, the next good show will depend on how Hu Xijin eliminates the US aircraft carrier formation.

(This article only represents the author’s point of view and position, please indicate the source for reprinting, thank you)